Reinventing the Museum: The Next Ten Years of Experiential Interpretation

Reinventing the Museum: The Next Ten Years of Experiential Interpretation
Reframing Interpretation and Research for the Experiential Turn
Museums are entering a new era, one where interpretation is no longer just about delivering information, but about creating rich, emotional, and memorable visitor experiences. Over the next decade, we’ll see a major shift toward experiential interpretation: immersive, sensory-driven, co-created, and emotionally impactful.
This piece looks at where interpretation is heading and what this means for those leading interpretation and research. It draws on theory, practice, and what’s already emerging in museums around the world, with a view to helping interpretation professionals stay ahead of the curve.
Moving from Telling to Dialogue
For many years, interpretation followed a one-way model: museums told visitors what they needed to know. But visitor expectations have shifted. People want to connect, contribute, and see their own stories reflected.
In the next ten years, interpretation will become more dialogic, less about broadcasting, more about exchange. That means welcoming multiple perspectives and accepting that meaning is made in conversation with visitors.
Concepts like New Museology, participatory practice (Simon, 2010), and constructivist learning theory (Hein, 1998) all support this shift. Interpretation will need to be more flexible, more inclusive, and more open to challenge.
Designing for the Senses and Emotions
Interpretation is no longer just visual and verbal. Research shows that engaging more senses and tapping into emotion creates stronger memories and deeper connections (Cahill & McGaugh, 1998; Shams & Seitz, 2008).
Expect to see more soundscapes, tactile elements, smells, and spatial storytelling integrated into exhibitions. Interpretation will often be experienced through the body as much as the mind, drawing on ideas from embodied cognition (Wilson, 2002).
For interpretation leads, this means working closely with designers, architects, and technologists to co-create these moments and build new skills in sensory and emotional design.
Telling Stories Through Space
Many exhibitions already guide visitors through a story, but in the coming decade, that sense of narrative journey will become more deliberate. Spatial storytelling, where architecture, flow, and movement shape the visitor’s emotional and cognitive experience will become a core interpretive tool.
Museums like the Canadian Museum for Human Rights have already pioneered this approach. Interpretation leads will need to think like dramaturgs as well as researchers: how does a visitor’s movement through a space reflect a story arc? Where is the moment of pause, climax, or reflection?
Emotion Will Be a Central Design Element
We often think of interpretation as objective, but in truth, it’s always shaped by emotion. Museums are starting to embrace this not just using facts, but creating feelings.
Over the next ten years, emotional storytelling will become a standard part of interpretive design. Whether it’s building empathy, provoking curiosity, or inspiring hope, interpretation will need to evoke genuine emotional responses to be effective.
This doesn’t mean being sentimental or manipulative. It means being intentional about how interpretation feels, as well as what it says.
Sharing Authority and Co-Creating Content
Another big shift is about who gets to interpret. Historically, museums controlled the narrative. But increasingly, interpretation is co-created with communities, artists, and subject-matter stakeholders.
This trend will deepen over the next decade. Institutions will need to recognise and value different ways of knowing, especially those rooted in lived experience or community practice.
Interpretation and research leads will play a key role in navigating this space: supporting shared authorship, maintaining curatorial integrity, and helping institutions make space for new voices.
Breaking Down Silos
Experiential interpretation doesn’t live in one department. It draws on storytelling, technology, architecture, education, performance, and beyond. That means interpretation professionals will need to work in new ways, bringing people together across roles and disciplines.
In the future, interpretation teams may look more like creative studios: a mix of writers, researchers, designers, dramaturgs, facilitators, and technologists all working together.
For institutions, this calls for new ways of planning, budgeting, and working collaboratively across silos.
Rethinking Success
As interpretation evolves, so too must the ways we evaluate it. Traditional metrics, like dwell time or survey scores don’t tell us much about how visitors feel or what they remember long-term.
Over the next decade, interpretation teams will adopt new evaluation tools: emotional response mapping, post-visit storytelling, biometric data, and qualitative interviews. These approaches will help us understand not just whether visitors learned something, but whether they were moved, changed, or inspired.
Interpretation will reclaim its role as a site of research, not just about content, but about the visitor experience.
Conclusion: Curating Experiences, Not Just Content
The next ten years will fundamentally reshape the field of museum interpretation. It will no longer be about simply writing a label or summarising a story. Instead, interpretation will be about curating experiences, sensory, emotional, spatial, and shared.
For interpretation and research leads, this is an opportunity to lead from the front. By embracing new methods, working across disciplines, and putting visitors at the heart of the story, they can shape interpretation that is more powerful, inclusive, and relevant than ever before.
This is not a loss of rigour, it’s an expansion of what rigour means. The museum of the future needs interpretation leaders who can connect emotion, evidence, and experience into something unforgettable.
References:
Hein, G. (1998). Learning in the Museum.
Simon, N. (2010). The Participatory Museum.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). The Museum Experience Revisited.
Cahill, L., & McGaugh, J. L. (1998). Mechanisms of Emotional Memory.
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of Multisensory Learning.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation.
Sandell, R. (2007). Museums, Prejudice and the Reframing of Difference.
Vergo, P. (1989). The New Museology.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six Views of Embodied Cognition.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination.
Black, G. (2005). The Engaging Museum.
By Joshua Murton, Managing Director - Populate
Work with us: info@wearepopulate.com
Join us: careers@wearepopulate.com
Talk about us: media@wearepopulate.com
